An Ice Age after the Flood ?? As proposed by some creation scientists
An Ice Age after the Flood ?? As proposed by some creation scientists
!
Reference: ICR Impact #361 "Are Polar Ice Sheets Only 4500 Years Old?", June
2003 (http://www.icr.org/newsletters/impact/impactjuly03.html)
"And you, be ye fruitful, and multiply bring forth abundantly in
the earth,and multiply therein. (Genesis 9:7)
So while the LORD is instructing Noah and his offspring to be fruitful, the
scientists at the Institute for Creation Research are saying that He make their
life very difficult after the flood by putting them through an Ice Age!
While the LORD in Genesis 8:21-22 says:
"I will not again curse the ground any more for
man's sake: ... While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, ... shall
not cease"
"And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a
vineyard:" Genesis 9:20 Apparently while still living amongst the
"mountains of Ararat" since the migration of his offspring to "a plain
in the land of Shinar" does not come until Genesis 11:2.
Note that three
glaciers (black areas) are shown in the Black/Caspian Sea region on the map
below of Eurasia during the ice age maximum (LGM), which is not really a detail
map. Therefore, the task of growing a vineyard amongst the mountains of Ararat
in the middle of an ice age would be comparable to growing one now in the
valleys amongst the glaciers in Alaska! (P.S. Vineyards are not grown in
Alaska)(1)
The following figure shows the climatic condition of Eurasia during the ice
age maximum, with the brown area being cold and desert or simi-desert, including
the mountainous areas between the Black and Caspian Seas, with glaciers in the
higher altitudes (black areas). The green and yellow show areas favorable for
human habitation in wet and dry periods, respectively. (Red shows the extended
land area due to low sea levels)
( from
http://www.innerx.net/personal/tsmith/iceciv.html)
And the same theme is found from the additional sources at the end of this
discussion, indicating that possibly there are no forests to be found anywhere
in the Middle East region during a glacial maximum. Only desert and semi-desert
and possible in some select areas, near bodies of water, scrub/grassland and a
few isolated trees (5% to 20% tree cover in areas south of the Black Sea). In
addition to these areas being drier according to the paleoclimatologists, they
also report that on the average many areas are up to 15 degrees C colder during
the glacial period. From examining the Biblical record and the paleoclimate
records it appears unlikely that there was an Ice Age after the flood, this
appears to be very inconsistent with the words of the LORD just after the
flood in Genesis 8:22!
Of course one could say that Noah was very creative at farming and irrigation
or he found a nice isolated warm "oasis" to plant his vineyard, that major
agriculture in the Middle East will have to wait until the ice age is over. But,
in order for all the survivors of the flood to multiply greatly they are going
to need an abundant supply of food as they spread over the territory and the
question is, could they find it living under the ice age environment? There is
no indication in the Scriptures that the LORD aided them in any way with any
miraculous supplies of food, or a "garden". What did they all do for the 1000
years of the ice age as proposed, or how ever long one proposes that it lasted?
Guessing from Figure 1 of the reference, we have very roughly 6200 years at an
average rate of 0.225 meters/year = the top 1400 meters and 800 years at an
average of about 2.0 meters/year = the lower 1600 meters, for about 7,000 years
ago for the flood. (2)
Or guess one could adopt the very popular "out-of-Africa" theory, they all
went directly to the most habitable area of Africa, there they multiplied for
say 1000 years and then migrated back to the Middle East after the ice age was
over? There is nothing in Scripture to support this theory!
Or, are they depending upon Genesis 10:25, "for in his days was the earth
divided" to move the earth crust around so it all works out OK? So that after
the flood the land mass that Noah and offspring were on was located so as to
have a climate similar to that of Africa at the scientists LGM. However, this
would seem to ignore that the paleoclimatologists are basing their climate maps
on evidences that they obtain from the land masses as they are now
geographically located, since melting glaciers deposited huge amounts of rocks
and dirt far from their origins. Geologists use aerial photography and satellite
imagery to map the movements of ancient glaciers. Glaciers leave behind telltale
features such as cirques, which are depressions at the heads of U-shaped
valleys, and vast plains littered with glacial debris. Also radar is used to
look below surface soil for evidence of glacial activity that more recent events
might have covered.
( from
http://www.wooster.edu/geology/geo300/sbcb.html)
( from
http://www.shef.ac.uk/geography/staff/clark_chris.html)
The well
preserved nature of the ice age glacial scars are an indication that the terrain
has not undergone extremely major changes since the glacial age. These polar
centric patterns indicating that any major land mass movement would have to have
occurred before glaciation. If Eurasia had been located in the equatorial region
during the ice age these glacial marking would not exist in northern Eurasia.
And then, if one goes strictly by Scriptural context, the "dividing" must be the
forming of nations, countries, for that is the theme of all of chapter 10. To
conclude that the "dividing" is due to plate tectonic movement is to ignore the
context of the Scriptures.
( from http://lgb.unige.ch/lgmvegetation/)
( from
http://www.esd.ornl.gov/projects/qen/nerc.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment