Sargon of Akkad and Nimrod
Part Two:
Naram-Sin of Akkad and Nimrod
by
Damien F. Mackey
“Now, Naram-Sin similarly sought to assert his human authority towards,
and even against, the gods”.
Historum.com
If Sargon of
Akkad were the biblical Nimrod, as some think to have been the case, and, if
Sargon and Naram-Sin were the same person – all of this tentatively suggested in
Part One: https://www.academia.edu/39490686/Sargon_of_Akkad_and_Nimrod
then it must irresistibly
follow that Naram-Sin and Nimrod were the same person.
That connection
Naram-Sin = Nimrod has already been picked up on the Internet.
For instance,
there is this contribution: “All of these lines of logic lead to the strong
suggestion, that Naram-Sin was the basis for the biblical Nimrod”, at:
historical Naram-Sin resembles biblical Nimrod
Nimrod is mythically remembered for seeking to assert human immunity to
Divine demands, and reliance on local human authority:
Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of
God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great
strength of hand.
He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it were through his
means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which
procured that happiness.
He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other
way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant
dependence on his power.
He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to
drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters
to reach. And that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their
forefathers (Josephus).
Now, Naram-Sin similarly sought to assert his human
authority towards, and even against, the gods. And, the historical Great Flood
had happened c.3000 BC, during a regional climatic anomaly ([ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piora_Oscillation"]Wiki[/ame]). That Great Flood
was widely attributed to Divine Displeasure, against Sumer. So, if Naram-Sin,
as Nimrod, sensed a second, similar, regional climatic anomaly, then he might
have tried to stave off social unrest, by asserting his personal power, against
'the gods'. All of these lines of logic lead to the strong suggestion, that
Naram-Sin was the basis for the biblical Nimrod.
And there is this
one: https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/548242954609572205/
“Naram sin is
another name given to Nimrod which is mentioned in the book of Genesis
(10:8)”.
And this one: https://forums.digitalpoint.com/threads/stele-of-naram-sin-king-depicted-as-a-living-god.2208768/
Naram-Sin was who? The Bible Genesis's own
Nimrod?
Naram-Sin was considered to be the king of the four corners of the universe. Not even his great grandfather Sargon could behold such a honor only referred to as king of Kish. This was because under Naram-Sin the Akkadian empire was at its peak.
Naram-Sin was considered to be the king of the four corners of the universe. Not even his great grandfather Sargon could behold such a honor only referred to as king of Kish. This was because under Naram-Sin the Akkadian empire was at its peak.
Some say the bible itself depicts
Naram-Sin as Nimrod son of Cush great grandson of Noah and king of shinar.
Nimrod was depicted as a man of power in earth, and a mighty hunter. He was
rebellious to god. Genesis said in the beginning of his kingdom were the
towns of Babel, Akkad, and Calneh in land of shinar (Mesopotamia). ….
E. Kraeling, in “The
Origin and Real Name of Nimrod” (The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures, Vol. 38, no. 3,
April, 1922) will go so far as to write that (p. 220): “… Naram-Sin’s son built
E-igi-kalama, “the house of the eye of the lands”, as the place where Nimrod
was to be worshiped …”.
Further to all
this, I have tentatively identified Naram-Sin as Narmer:
Narmer a
Contemporary of Patriarch Abraham. Part Two: Narmer as Naram Sin.
And, as noted
below, David Rohl has linked “Narmer and Nimrod” (though it must be said that the
linguistic correspondence in this case is far from ideal):
This is
interesting, then, when we establish a link between Narmer and Nimrod. Most
Ancient Days, a
revisionist chronology site, links
the two based on the Narmer plate. David Rohl makes the same comparison.
Narmer also has no recorded genealogy, maybe because his parents were
pre-Egyptian? ….
No comments:
Post a Comment